<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michel Odent didn&#8217;t write the article&#8230;!</title>
	<link>http://www.thecowgoddess.com/2008/04/29/michel-odent-didnt-write-the-article/</link>
	<description>The Evolution Revolution</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: janaki</title>
		<link>http://www.thecowgoddess.com/2008/04/29/michel-odent-didnt-write-the-article/#comment-3655</link>
		<author>janaki</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecowgoddess.com/2008/04/29/michel-odent-didnt-write-the-article/#comment-3655</guid>
					<description>*whew* THAT'S a relief!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*whew* THAT&#8217;S a relief!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sewathomemama</title>
		<link>http://www.thecowgoddess.com/2008/04/29/michel-odent-didnt-write-the-article/#comment-3662</link>
		<author>sewathomemama</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecowgoddess.com/2008/04/29/michel-odent-didnt-write-the-article/#comment-3662</guid>
					<description>why does that article say "by Michel Odent"? that is extremely misleading. anyone know who actually conducted the interview &#38; wrote the article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why does that article say &#8220;by Michel Odent&#8221;? that is extremely misleading. anyone know who actually conducted the interview &amp; wrote the article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msrlmoss</title>
		<link>http://www.thecowgoddess.com/2008/04/29/michel-odent-didnt-write-the-article/#comment-3666</link>
		<author>msrlmoss</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thecowgoddess.com/2008/04/29/michel-odent-didnt-write-the-article/#comment-3666</guid>
					<description>Well, it's hardly surprising. The Daily Mail over here in the UK is a right-winged, illiberal tabloid that masquerades as a "proper newspaper". It is well-known for racism, misogyny, homophobia - and in fact general levels of bigotry - not to mention poor journalism and sensationalist stories. Of particular "interest" are its so-called "Femail" pages which contradict themselves with health-scare style stories almost every day and serve only to make women feel guilty about whatever it is they're doing! (And yet the paper has a high female readership - go figure!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s hardly surprising. The Daily Mail over here in the UK is a right-winged, illiberal tabloid that masquerades as a &#8220;proper newspaper&#8221;. It is well-known for racism, misogyny, homophobia - and in fact general levels of bigotry - not to mention poor journalism and sensationalist stories. Of particular &#8220;interest&#8221; are its so-called &#8220;Femail&#8221; pages which contradict themselves with health-scare style stories almost every day and serve only to make women feel guilty about whatever it is they&#8217;re doing! (And yet the paper has a high female readership - go figure!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
